Ariel Reviews
More Pages: Ariel Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101


One of a Kind

One of a Kind

Some big books are not big evils*The Life of Greece* is the second volume in Will Durant's universal history of "that subtle and precarious luxury called civilization, without which life would have no beauty, and history no meaning" (p129). It is divided into five books: Aegean Prelude (3500-1000 B.C.); The Rise of Greece (1000-480 B.C.); The Golden Age (480-399 B.C.); The Decline and Fall of Greek Freedom (399-322 B.C.); and The Hellenistic Dispersion (322-146 B.C.).
Unlike the first volume, which (among other things) devoted from one to three hundred pages to the histories of India, China and Japan from the origins to the 1930s, this second volume, though shorter than the first (670 pages, not counting the bibliography and index), is much more focused and can afford to narrate in greater detail the political and military events that make up most of the bulk of traditional history books.
As if suffering from an excess of testosterone, Greek civilization was bellicose, extroverted, virile and sensualistic, down to its very modern hysteria over spectator sports, but it redeemed itself with a plethora of literary and philosophical geniuses after whom very little significant intellectual progress remained to be made: at best, we can boast improved measurements, judging by Anaxagoras's wonderful statement that "the sun is a red-hot masss many times larger than the Peloponnesus".
A recurring phrase in the book is "so old is...". Between them, for instance, the systems of Democritus, Empedocles and Epicurus contained virtually the whole philosophical import of modern science. "Realism and nominalism, idealism and materialism, monotheism, pantheism, and atheism, feminism and communism, the Kantian critique and the Schopenauerian despair, the primitivism of Rousseau and the immoralism of Nietzsche, the synthesis of Spencer and the psychoanalysis of Freud- all the dreams and wisdom of philosophy are here, in the age and land of its birth" (p670.)
Durant, the author of an acclaimed "Story of Philosophy", is particularly brilliant at essentializing the various philosophical systems of the period. For instance, he explains in a footnote that "in Plato's theory of ideas, Heracleitus and Parmenides are reconciled: Heracleitus is right, and flux is true, in the world of sense; Parmenides is right, and changeless unity is true, in the world of ideas" (p516) - a brilliant remark which I thought Leonard Peikoff had been the first to make.
Regretfully, however, Durant underestimates the philosophical stature of Aristotle, proposing to "consider him chiefly as a scientist" and noting almost immediately that "it is in biology that [he was] most at home": "All in all, the *History of Animals* is Aristotle's greatest work". Durant's pragmatic and often derogatory conception of philosophy (in volume three, he refers for instance to "the deserts of logic and metaphysics") and his defensible conviction that "there are no beginnings" may be partly to blame for this injustice which, anyway, does not seem to affect his solidarity with the "master of those who know". Indeed, it is hard not to perceive self-reference in such statements as: "When a man covers a vast field many errors may be forgiven him if the result adds to our comprehension of life.... When all deductions have been made, [Aristotle] still remains... a comforting inspiration to those who labor to bring man's scattered knowledge together into perspective and understanding." (p537)
Will Durant's *The Story of Civilization* is a brilliant illustration of the excellence a scholar can achieve with the best liberal education and a long-term acquaintance with the greatest historians from Herodotus to the present. Durant's opinion of Sallust (in volume 3) may be applied to him ("He deepened his narratives with philosophical commentary and psychological analysis and carved out a style of epigrammatic compactness and vivid rapidity which became a model") as well as the compliment that he is never boring, probably because he was an academic who did not write for his peers (as he comments on the Hellenistic period: "Poets began to write for poets, and became artificial; scholars began to write for scholars, and became dull.")
(Note: to compensate for the dearth of illustrations in the book, I had to rely on the maps provided in the Herodotus/Thucydides volume from Britannica's *Great Books of the Western World*; and bought copies of Gisela Richter's *A Handbook of Greek Art* and Peter Connolly's *Ancient Life in Classical Greece and Rome*, both of which were highly recommended to me.)


Vivid social and cultural history

This is the most useful medical Spanish book ever written.

Pichardo's ReviewMr.Reid, as difficult as it is to write down the Bel Canto Structure of Singing, has done an excellent job of attempting to get it on paper, as close to the real thing as I have ever read. The book is also very interesting in its writing and is enjoyable and fairly easy to read. I say this, being one of many who say they teach this method, and one of the very few, who actually knows and understands what Bel Canto is in singing. In his other, later writings on this subject, while there are truths in these works, Mr. Reid does somewhat stray from the purity of this method, perhaps in an attempt to not be so heartily disagreed with, as most singing/voice teachers, the majority as it were, have not a clue to what he was writing about. I strongly suggest that this book, for reference, be in everbody's musical library.
Thank you,
Luis Pichardo


Sincere Advice from Real Experience

hjhg hg hgkjhgk hj hgk

lerning hebrew

Pickup Trucks